[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch |
|
Date: |
Wed, 08 Feb 2017 07:54:34 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> As a matter of interest, what was the real use case for this, how often
> do you do it, and how big would the loss be if you couldn't do it any
> more?
I'm not worried about breaking users's expectations in this regard.
The problem is with packages's expectations. We need packages to be able
to get "the other" behavior.
Stefan
- Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch, (continued)
- Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/02/02
- Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/02/03
- Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/05
- Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/02/06
- Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/06
- Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/02/07
- Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/07
- Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/02/07
- Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/08
Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/02
Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch, Yuri Khan, 2017/02/03