[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature |
|
Date: |
Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:33:39 +0200 |
> From: Jordon Biondo <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:59:19 -0500
> Cc: John Wiegley <address@hidden>, Emacs development discussions
> <address@hidden>
>
> My paperwork is now complete, if that's the only thing holding up this patch.
Thanks. Could you please re-submit your patch, and add to it suitable
changes to NEWS and to the ELisp manual?
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Tino Calancha, 2017/02/01
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, John Wiegley, 2017/02/01
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/01
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Jordon Biondo, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Jordon Biondo, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Jordon Biondo, 2017/02/08
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature,
Eli Zaretskii <=