Re: bug#16026: Connection specific settings and proxies

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:17:22 +0100 Michael Albinus <address@hidden> wrote: 

MA> We shouldn't even call this "defgroup", but still "application". We
MA> might say then, if the application symbol is also an existing defgroup,
MA> then there will be bonus features in the customization. But it still
MA> shall work if a corresponding defgroup doesn't exist.

Yes, exactly.

MA> I'm still sorting out. Will try to puzzle an example in order to see how
MA> it goes. (And as usual, much to less time to spend)

OK, let me know. We can write some tests against the matcher when you're
ready to try it practically and to establish the API. Thanks for looking
at this, I am excited about it.

Ted