[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file |
|
Date: |
Mon, 01 May 2017 15:07:08 +0300 |
> From: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 11:40:46 +0000
>
> All I'm suggesting is that the impact of such changes should be
> measured, and that startup time in batch mode isn't everything.
Startup time in batch mode isn't everything, but if it's a frequent
use case in which even relatively short delays are tangible, we should
try to find a way of minimizing those delays.
- Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file, Philipp Stephani, 2017/05/01
- Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file, Daniel Colascione, 2017/05/18
- compiled lisp file format (Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file), Ken Raeburn, 2017/05/21
- Re: compiled lisp file format (Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file), Paul Eggert, 2017/05/28
- Re: compiled lisp file format (Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file), Ken Raeburn, 2017/05/29
- Re: compiled lisp file format (Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file), Paul Eggert, 2017/05/29