emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: libnettle/libhogweed WIP


From: Andreas Schwab
Subject: Re: libnettle/libhogweed WIP
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 12:09:17 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)

On Jun 03 2017, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:

>> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>,  address@hidden
>> Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 11:00:16 +0200
>> 
>> On Jun 03 2017, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>> >   +  Lisp_Object object        = Fnth (make_number (0), spec);
>> >   +  Lisp_Object start        = Fnth (make_number (1), spec);
>> >   +  Lisp_Object end          = Fnth (make_number (2), spec);
>> >   +  Lisp_Object coding_system = Fnth (make_number (3), spec);
>> >   +  Lisp_Object noerror      = Fnth (make_number (4), spec);
>> >
>> > Isn't it simpler to use XCAR and XCDR here?
>> 
>> Wouldn't it be even simpler to just pass each argument separately?
>
> Maybe it would, but given the amount of procrastination about the form
> of the arguments to these function, I'm not sure we want to re-argue
> all that again.

I don't understand.  This is just an internal helper function.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]