[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:32:12 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> To a first approximation, in my experience, weak licenses are promoted
>> by people who don't like to say "free software" (and even less talk
>> about software freedom) while people who use the word "free software" or
>> "software freedom" will usually promote the GPL.
> There are also those people who will argue that weak licenses are
> "more free" than the GPL because they allow the licensee more freedom
> of use and distribution.
Notice that I did not talk about which license is more free (which
I find to be a meaningless debate), only about correlation between two
different behaviors.
Stefan
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, (continued)
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, John Wiegley, 2017/08/22
- [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Stefan Monnier, 2017/08/22
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Radon Rosborough, 2017/08/23
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Paul Eggert, 2017/08/23
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, John Wiegley, 2017/08/23
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Richard Stallman, 2017/08/23
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Richard Stallman, 2017/08/23
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Stefan Monnier, 2017/08/24
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, Richard Stallman, 2017/08/23
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, Richard Stallman, 2017/08/22