Re: OK to put lisp/progmodes/flymake.el in ELPA as a :core package?

[Stefan Monnier]

> The only thing that's slightly putting me off is flymake.el's
> requirement of lisp/progmodes/flymake-proc.el _after_ the `provide`
> statement.  It's odd, but shouldn't be a problem, right?

It's sub-optimal, but sometimes it's better then the other options.
In any case I don't see why it should be a problem for GNU ELPA packaging.

> So, if no-one opposes I will be commiting this in the near future:

No objection on my side,


        Stefan