Re: Proposed changes to gnus-dup.el

[Basil L. Contovounesios]

"Basil L. Contovounesios" <address@hidden> writes:

> Eric Abrahamsen <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On 03/25/19 18:13 PM, Basil L. Contovounesios wrote:
>>>
>>> I will wait a few more days for people to comment and push the
>>> rest of the patch if there are no serious objections.
>>
>> If I end up backing out the hash-table changes, will this patch still
>> apply correctly?
>
> The original patch I sent will conflict with the hunks where you added
> docstrings to gnus-dup-{list,hashtb} and switched from obarray to
> hash-table operations.
>
> It would be easy for me to resolve these minor conflicts, but if that's
> going to get in your way of more pressing work, then I'll hold off.
> (That's not to say I think you should revert the hash-table changes.)

Eric, just to be clear: may I push these minor changes, or would you
rather I held off?

Thanks,

-- 
Basil