Re: accumulated timers which machine is in suspend-to-ram

[Michael Heerdegen]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

> That's strange, because if you have the same problem as Stefan, I
> think this is veteran functionality, see my response in bug#35400.

Yes, strange indeed.  But I'm very sure that the original issue (Emacs
busy for quite a long time after wake up) is new.  The latest commits
somehow changed the behavior, so the reason is probably not as trivial
as the bug report suggests.  Maybe the 10 is not honored anymore because
of the integer conversions?  Or something like that?

Michael.