Re: gnus-bug

[Tassilo Horn]

Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:

> Not sure whether that was asked before. Gnus is now part of GNU emacs, 
> should I still use 
>
>     1. gnus-bug
>     2. Or report-emacs-bug?

The end result is always the same, a report in debbugs.  What's a bit
different is the default text inserted into the message.

> BTW, if gnus-bug should not be used, I suggest to remove it. 
> In case I can use it  I think the naming should be unified. So
> report-gnus-bug instead of gnus-bug.

I guess the name is that way because it's the original name, and because
usually all functions of a package start with the package name.

Bye,
Tassilo