[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs CLA requirement
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs CLA requirement |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:22:24 +0000 |
Andrei Kuznetsov <r12451428287@163.com> writes:
> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> What do you mean by "system X"? Could you give a more concrete example?
>
> I can't think of one right now; I'm not a lawyer.
>
> However, tivolization was one of the issues resolved by the GPLv3 in the
> past.
But isn't the issue, that previous releases have still been released
under the old GPL version? Apple continues distributing GPLv2 software
even though the newer versions have had their versions updated.
--
Philip K.
Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/18
Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/06/16
- Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/06/16
- Re: Emacs CLA requirement,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: Emacs CLA requirement, tomas, 2021/06/16
- Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/06/16
- [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), Stefan Monnier, 2021/06/16
- [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), Christopher Dimech, 2021/06/16
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), Eli Zaretskii, 2021/06/16
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), tomas, 2021/06/16
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), Alexandre Garreau, 2021/06/16
Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/06/16
Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/06/16
Emacs CLA requirement, Christopher Dimech, 2021/06/16