[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Better emoji support
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: Better emoji support |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:02:54 +0200 |
>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:27:58 +0200, Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> said:
Robert> Yes. I think this only implements one of the four items in there for
Robert> emoji support, but theyʼre all fairly orthogonal.
Hi Eli,
Now that Iʼve looked at the patch again, I think I need some
guidance.
tr51 defines which codepoints have the 'Emoji' property, and
which additionally have the 'Emoji_Presentation' property. The latter
means they should in the absence of a variation selector be displayed
as emoji.
My current implementation assigns codepoints with the
'Emoji_Presentation' property to the 'emoji' script, since thatʼs all
we have to work with regarding font selection. But there are
codepoints that donʼt have that property that *could* be displayed as
emoji, so perhaps I should base it off the 'Emoji' property instead?
(with a small exception for codepoints <= #xAE).
(thereʼs probably a similar question for 'Extended_Pictographic' that
needs investigation)
Robert
--
- Better emoji support, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/10
- Re: Better emoji support, Robert Pluim, 2021/07/10
- Re: Better emoji support, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/10
- Re: Better emoji support, Robert Pluim, 2021/07/10
- Re: Better emoji support, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/10
- Re: Better emoji support, Robert Pluim, 2021/07/12
- Re: Better emoji support,
Robert Pluim <=
- Re: Better emoji support, Robert Pluim, 2021/07/12
- Re: Better emoji support, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/12
- Re: Better emoji support, Jean Louis, 2021/07/13
- Re: Better emoji support, Robert Pluim, 2021/07/13
- Re: Better emoji support, Robert Pluim, 2021/07/15
- Re: Better emoji support, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/15