[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitte
From: |
Andrei Kuznetsov |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:38:35 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> If you are talking about affecting how TS does lexical analysis for
> some language, then I see no reason why we in the Emacs project would
> want to do that. We don't _want_ to develop parsers if we can use
> parsers available out there. Lexical analysis of a parser is
> determined by the language it parses, so you need only to change the
> parser when the language changes, or to fix a bug. Both are part of
> the job of the TS developers, so there should be no need for us to get
> busy with that. Exactly like we do with other libraries we use that
> aren't developed as part of the Emacs project.
Okay, thanks for the clarification
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, (continued)
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Ergus, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter,
Andrei Kuznetsov <=
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Manuel Giraud, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Perry E. Metzger, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Perry E. Metzger, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Perry E. Metzger, 2021/07/29