[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitte
From: |
Manuel Giraud |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:41:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (berkeley-unix) |
Andrei Kuznetsov <r12451428287@163.com> writes:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> If you are talking about affecting how TS does lexical analysis for
>> some language, then I see no reason why we in the Emacs project would
>> want to do that. We don't _want_ to develop parsers if we can use
>> parsers available out there. Lexical analysis of a parser is
>> determined by the language it parses, so you need only to change the
>> parser when the language changes, or to fix a bug. Both are part of
>> the job of the TS developers, so there should be no need for us to get
>> busy with that. Exactly like we do with other libraries we use that
>> aren't developed as part of the Emacs project.
>
> Okay, thanks for the clarification
Yes, thanks for these clarifications and sorry for my
misunderstanding. I still have one question left though: will the
parsers C code (and TS C code) land into the emacs repo or will TS be
accessible as an external library?
--
Manuel Giraud
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, (continued)
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Ergus, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter,
Manuel Giraud <=
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Perry E. Metzger, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Perry E. Metzger, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Perry E. Metzger, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/30