|
| From: | Perry E. Metzger |
| Subject: | Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Jul 2021 11:12:14 -0400 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.0 |
On 7/28/21 07:43, Andrei Kuznetsov wrote:
Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> writes:Some of the tree-sitter development tools are implemented in Rust; you only need Rust if you are developing/fixing a grammar for a language.If I understand this correctly, it means one would require the Rust toolchain to support new languages in tree-sitter, or to improve existing support.
That's not true. Tree Sitter is not written even partially in Rust. It does have Rust bindings for people who use Rust.
Perry
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |