Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter

[Stephen Leake]

"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes:

> On 7/28/21 07:43, Andrei Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> writes:
>>
>>> Some of the tree-sitter development tools are implemented in Rust; you
>>> only need Rust if you are developing/fixing a grammar for a language.
>> If I understand this correctly, it means one would require the Rust
>> toolchain to support new languages in tree-sitter, or to improve
>> existing support.
>
> That's not true. Tree Sitter is not written even partially in Rust. It
> does have Rust bindings for people who use Rust.

https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/tree/master/cli/src

-- 
-- Stephe