[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitte
From: |
Stephen Leake |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Jul 2021 05:12:54 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (windows-nt) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
>> Cc: Andrei Kuznetsov <r12451428287@163.com>, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr,
>> emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:12:56 -0700
>>
>> > TS's code is written in plain C, and doesn't require any regeneration
>> > or source modifications. Anything else is misunderstanding.
>>
>> That's true for the common TS runtime, which implements the parser and
>> error recovery, but the code for each language, that builds the LR parse
>> table and some other data structures, is generated in C from a grammar
>> file written in javascript, and must be linked into Emacs somehow.
>
> That "linking" happens when Emacs is linked against the TS library,
> right?
I don't know what you mean by "the TS library".
I'm guessing you mean the tree-sitter runtime, in which case no, that
does not include any languages.
--
-- Stephe
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, (continued)
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Arthur Miller, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Ergus, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Arthur Miller, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter,
Stephen Leake <=
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/31
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/31
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/31
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Ergus, 2021/07/28
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28