[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitte
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:12:03 +0300 |
> From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
> Cc: r12451428287@163.com, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 09:55:46 -0700
>
> >> I don't know what you mean by "the TS library".
> >
> > I mean libtree-sitter.a produced by building the library.
> >
> >> I'm guessing you mean the tree-sitter runtime, in which case no, that
> >> does not include any languages.
> >
> > "Include" in what sense?
>
> There is no code in libtree-sitter.a that provides a language; all
> languages are built separately, by the language developers.
>
> https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter builds libtree-sitter.a, and
> the command line tools to build a language.
>
> https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-python builds the object file
> providing the python language.
>
> There are many other languages, each with its own repository.
We are talking past each other. But I don't think we should keep
arguing about this, because there's no real disagreement here to argue
about.
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, (continued)
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Ergus, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Arthur Miller, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/31
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/31
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/31
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Ergus, 2021/07/28
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28