[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dired C idea
From: |
Arthur Miller |
Subject: |
Re: Dired C idea |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Aug 2021 10:44:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org> writes:
>>>>> I would like to see some benchmark figures first. For example, I'm not
>>>>> sure
>>>>> that rsync performs better when the target directory does not exist yet,
>>>>> and there's nothing to sync.
>>>>
>>>> I made some comparison between "cp -pr" and "rsync -pr" on shell
>>>> level. [...] "rsync -pr" is slower than "cp -pr".
>>>
>>> Yes, nothing can beat cp;
>>
>> Is cp really bottleneck at all? Isn't it more likely IO that is limiting
>> operation?
>>
>
> cp does (almost) nothing except IO, so indeed IO is the bottleneck. rsync does
> more than IO, so it is slower.
Yes, that is what I meant.
But some nice interface to rsync for other reasons than efficiency would
be nice, maybe partly incorporated in dired, for example sync dirs dwim
style or something similar.
- Re: Dired C idea, (continued)
- Re: Dired C idea, Michael Albinus, 2021/08/02
- Re: Dired C idea, Michael Albinus, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Gregory Heytings, 2021/08/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Dired C idea, Drew Adams, 2021/08/03
- Re: [External] : Re: Dired C idea, Pankaj Jangid, 2021/08/04
- RE: [External] : Re: Dired C idea, Drew Adams, 2021/08/04
- Re: Dired C idea, Arthur Miller, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Gregory Heytings, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Stefan Monnier, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Andreas Schwab, 2021/08/04
- Re: Dired C idea,
Arthur Miller <=
- Re: Dired C idea, Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Eric Abrahamsen, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Arthur Miller, 2021/08/04
- Re: Dired C idea, Richard Stallman, 2021/08/05
Re: Dired C idea, Peter Oliver, 2021/08/07