[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0
From: |
Arthur Miller |
Subject: |
Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Aug 2021 16:53:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Arthur Miller <arthur.miller@live.com>
>> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, raman@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 15:20:19 +0200
>>
>> >> Why do you even care for -Q option there? You would like to do it async,
>> >> so just start the process with user settings and forgett about it and
>> >> let it chew until it's done.
>> >
>> > Starting "emacs -batch" with user settings could easily fail, since
>> > many settings in the init files are for interactive sessions, and will
>> > signal errors when done in batch mode.
>>
>> Aha. Ok. Fair enough. But why runing in batch mode at all.
>>
>> Why not start normal emacs server process on another socket and
>> ask it to refresh quickstart file form another client? Two processes,
>> but no tinkering needed? Would that work?
>
> You mean, start a new interactive session, open an Emacs frame, run
> all the customizations, including perhaps restoring the last session
> via desktop, etc.? Doesn't sound right to me.
I mean something like this:
(start-process
"quickstartserver" " *quickstartserver*"
(expand-file-name invocation-name invocation-directory)
"--daemon=quickstart-refresher")
(start-process
"quickstartclient" " *quickstartclient*"
"emacsclient"
"--socket-name=quickstart-refresher"
"--eval "
"'(progn (require 'package) (package-quickstart-refresh) (kill-emacs))'")
I am not sure how do I pass eval argument to cient in
start-process. When I run above start process for server it runs, and I
can run belov progn to generate quickstart file and kill emacs from
terminal. But when I start client with start-process it does not seem to
run. I guess I am not getting arguments correctly, but that is the
idea. Sure less efficient then with --batch, but I don't think it
matters; it is run once in a while in async process.
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, (continued)
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, T.V Raman, 2021/08/05
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, T.V Raman, 2021/08/05
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, Stefan Monnier, 2021/08/05
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, T.V Raman, 2021/08/05
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, Stefan Monnier, 2021/08/05
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, Arthur Miller, 2021/08/06
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/06
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, Arthur Miller, 2021/08/06
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/06
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, Arthur Miller, 2021/08/06
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el,
Arthur Miller <=
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, chad, 2021/08/06
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/07
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, Arthur Miller, 2021/08/07
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, Stefan Monnier, 2021/08/06
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, T.V Raman, 2021/08/06
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/05
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, T.V Raman, 2021/08/05
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/05
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, Stefan Monnier, 2021/08/05
- Re: Async rebuild package-quickstart after packages update? was Re: 28.0.50; Proposal: slightly more efficient package-quickstart.el, T.V Raman, 2021/08/05