[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:11:00 +0200 |
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
> The reason I use rx in a lot of my scripts is that I can add comments,
> explanations, formatting, etc. when it gets complicated. I think that is
> a significant advantage, that even raw strings wouldn't have (unless a
> comment syntax were to be added into the regular expression language,
> which is unlikely).
Perl has this:
perl -e '$foo = "bar"; print "yes" if $foo =~ / bar # comment /x;'
is equivalent to
perl -e '$foo = "bar"; print "yes" if $foo =~ /bar/;'
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp, (continued)
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp, Stefan Monnier, 2021/09/08
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/09/08
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp, Alan Mackenzie, 2021/09/08
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp,
Stefan Kangas <=
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/09/08
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp, tomas, 2021/09/09
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/08
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp, tomas, 2021/09/08
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/09/08
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp, Stefan Monnier, 2021/09/08
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp, Stefan Monnier, 2021/09/08
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp, tomas, 2021/09/09
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp, Mattias Engdegård, 2021/09/09
- Re: "Raw" string literals for elisp, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/09