Re: Improve `replace-regexp-in-string' ergonomics?

[Po Lu]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Well, then I don't think we should feel constrained by its existence
> when choosing function names for Emacs core.  (Not that I think that
> `regexp-replace' is a good name -- but it's just hard to come up with
> something that's short, not awkward and hasn't already been taken.
> `re-replace'?  `string-replace-re'?  `string-replace-regexp'?
> `string-re'?  Naming is hard.)

Fair enough, I'd also say  `re-replace' LGTM.

Thanks.