Re: Confusing doc string of list-or-string at point

[Juri Linkov]

>>  (defun thing-at-point--end-of-sexp ()
>>    "Move point to the end of the current sexp."
>> -  (let ((char-syntax (syntax-after (point))))
>> +  (let ((char-syntax (char-syntax (char-after))))
>
> Splitting the work between `char-after` and `char-syntax` means that we
> can't obey any `syntax-table` text properties placed on that char.
> So I think the above change would be a regression in this sense (tho
> I understand it fixes or circumvents a bug elsewhere).

No bugs prompted this patch, just noticed the difference between
this function and its counterpart thing-at-point--beginning-of-sexp
that uses `(char-syntax (char-before))`.