[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Sep 2021 02:04:28 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Consider a prefix separator char like ':' so that the shorthand is
> easily distinguishable as a shorthand prefix? Might help in many ways:
We plan to use this for existing prefixes that do not have a colon.
For instance, 's-'.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Shorthands have landed on master, (continued)
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, João Távora, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, João Távora, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, João Távora, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, João Távora, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, T.V Raman, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, Ihor Radchenko, 2021/09/28