[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: Re Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias? |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Oct 2022 14:44:50 +0000 |
Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis@me.com> writes:
> Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes:
>
>> cpio-mode? dismal? ebdb? evil? sesman? pyim? rubocop? eglot?
>
> Also, we should eradicate the "i fetish". The "i" in "isearch" stands
> for "incremental", the "i" in "imenu" stands for "item", and the "i" in
> "ispell" stands for "interactive", etc. What does "ibuffer" do? How
> about "ielm"? The same applies to "e" fetish.
I still think it is preferable to add a single letter to an actual
word than make up a new one.