Philip Kaludercic<philipk@posteo.net> writes:
Tim Cross<theophilusx@gmail.com> writes:
Richard Stallman<rms@gnu.org> writes:
Can anyone suggest a way to describe the job that Eglot does, NOT
using technical jargon, or implementation details such as "LSP"?
Some ideas of the top of my head:
- ide-mode
- integrated-development-mode
- {smart,intelligent,clever}-mode
- programming-mode
- syntax-mode
I know it is too late now, but another idea might just be
"polygot"/"polygot-mode". Has some language connotation, close to
"Eglot" and is a real word.