Re: Turing on tree-sitter

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>,  casouri@gmail.com,
>   theo@thornhill.no,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 10:52:21 -0400
> 
> I think a buffer-local `treesit-mode` plus a `global-treesit-mode` would
> make a lot of sense, from a user's perspective.  This way they don't
> have to hunt for the name of the boolean variable that their mode
> decided to use to control the use of treesitter: all modes use the same
> boolean variable called `treesit-mode`.
> 
> Then again, to me a minor mode is something so cheap that the idea that
> "justification for a minor mode was too weak" is rather hard to grasp.

That's okay, I was the one who proposed a minor mode to begin with...