Re: Turing on tree-sitter

[Theodor Thornhill]

>
>My bad, I thought Theodor was saying he would add separate major modes 
>alongside non-tree-sitter major modes for the same language. Reading his 
>message I think he is only adding the tree-sitter powered mode into core and 
>leaving the non-tree-sitter version out.
>
>So IIUC we will have (a) major modes that supports both tree-sitter and 
>non-tree-sitter, and (b) major modes that require tree-sitter to work.
>
>Again, a M-x treesit-enable in a mode that requires tree-sitter to work 
>doesn’t make much sense. I think having individual major-mode level toggle 
>variables and a global toggle variable is conceptually more fit?
>

Agreed!