Re: Some issues with the tree-sitter branch

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 02:12:13 -0700
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> > That sounds fine to me, but I think we also should do something when
> > some value that can be larger than UINT_MAX is passed to tree-sitter
> > functions, because doing so might cause tree-sitter do something for a
> > completely unrelated portion of the buffer.  At the very least add
> > eassert there, so that at least a build with --enable-checking will
> > detect such cases.
> 
> IIUC you don’t want to hide and delay the error, right? That makes sense. I 
> can add assertions, those assertions shouldn’t interfere with normal usage.

Yes, please.