[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Oct 2022 07:58:38 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
ISTR that GCC did give some weight to `inline' when deciding whether
to inline a function. But I don't recall for certain -- when I worked
on GCC was 30 years ago.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, (continued)
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/17
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/17
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/17
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/17
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/17
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/18
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/18
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, tomas, 2022/10/18
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/18
- Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/18
Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays?,
Richard Stallman <=