[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Extending define-derived-mode
From: |
Theodor Thornhill |
Subject: |
Re: Extending define-derived-mode |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Jun 2023 07:43:05 +0200 |
Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:
>> On May 29, 2023, at 10:51 PM, Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 30 May 2023 07:16:49 CEST, Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> When we were adding tree-sitter modes a couple of month ago, it was
>>> clear that the current major mode model needs some upgrade, I’d like
>>> to discuss the things we need and how can we address them.
>>
>> Thanks for bringing this up!
>>
>> I'll quickly just add one more thing, and respond more thoroughly in a
>> different mail:
>>
>>
>> Maybe we can consider another abstraction to cover the following:
>>
>> - configure what set of modes to use for a given language
>> - set choice of diagnostic tool (flymake/flycheck etc)
>> - set LSP client implementation with config to use
>> - project based configs
>> - separate mode name and implementation
>>
>> I posted some time ago a simple idea covering this, and maybe the time is
>> now to revisit this idea? People seem to like doom Emacs/spacemacs etc, so
>> their idea of "layers" may be a nice route to consider.
>>
>> We can supply some DSL with preconfigured settings, and add extensible
>> functionalities.
>>
>> Maybe something like:
>>
>> (define-layer 'javascript-mode
>> :mode 'treesit
>> :enabled-in '(".js", ".mjs")
>> :diagnostic-backend 'flymake
>> :lsp-client 'lsp-mode ;; default is 'eglot
>> :project '(:root-function #'some-rootfinder-fn)
>> :other-stuff '(eslint json-something nvm))
>>
>> This may seem only tangentially related to your email, but I believe it is,
>> in that mode inheritance touches the "the first language mode implementation
>> owns the namespace"-problem.
>
> Yeah this look interesting. From your example it looks more like a
> configuration oriented, like a more integrated use-package. I feel like we
> should solve the "the first language mode implementation owns the
> namespace”-problem in a more direct and standalone way.
>
> Yuan
Yeah, I agree. This example would piggyback on such a solution.
- Re: Extending define-derived-mode, (continued)
Re: Extending define-derived-mode, Yuan Fu, 2023/06/02
Re: Extending define-derived-mode,
Theodor Thornhill <=
Re: Extending define-derived-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/06/01
Re: Extending define-derived-mode, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/06/05