|
From: | Gregory Heytings |
Subject: | Re: Small typo in calc.texi |
Date: | Tue, 13 Jun 2023 13:45:49 +0000 |
What is the problem with @expr{C_(-1)}?I just replaced @expr{C_(-1)} with @expr{C_{(-1)}}, despite syntax checker's complaints, and run make pdf. And the resulting pdf looks the way it should look, with all of (-1) in the sub-index.Anyway, since @expr is just an alias for @math, I guess we need some TeX expert to help us out here. Anyone?
I have some knowledge of TeX, and ISTM that Vladimir is right: with C_(-1) only the opening parenthesis is subscripted, which means that you get "C₍-1)", whereas with C_{(-1)} the expression (-1) is subscripted, which means that you get "C₍₋₁₎".
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |