[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-29 679e9d7c56e: ; Mention MinGW64 GCC 13.1 problems in PROBLEM
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-29 679e9d7c56e: ; Mention MinGW64 GCC 13.1 problems in PROBLEMS |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jun 2023 20:17:54 +0300 |
> From: Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 19:02:13 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > branch: emacs-29
> > commit 679e9d7c56e2296e3a218290d941e28002bf7722
> > Author: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> > Commit: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> >
> > ; Mention MinGW64 GCC 13.1 problems in PROBLEMS
> >
> > * etc/PROBLEMS: Mention the problems building with MinGW64 GCC
> > 13.1. (Bug#63365)
> > ---
> > [...]
> > + . Use non-default optimization flags. For example, configuring the
> > + build like this will avoid the problem:
> > +
> > + CFLAGS='-O1 -gdwarf-4 -g3' ./configure ...
>
> Thanks for adding this entry. This is probably a nit, but Emacs default
> is '-gdwarf-2'.
I know.
> Maybe the entry should stick to that and shouldn't open up a new
> possible source of confusion?
If you think this could cause confusion. I thought it won't, and
"-gdwarf-4" gives you a better debug info. (We don't use that by
default because I don't know which version of MinGW GCC started
supporting it.)