[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Android port
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Android port |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Aug 2023 20:16:14 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org> writes:
> Rationale: I cannot guarantee that Gnulib will be able to support %n
> in the long run. The "security-aware community" are filing CVEs here and
> there; %n is among their targets (it has already been disabled from libc
> on Ubuntu, macOS, and MSVC); and I don't know when they will discover
> that Gnulib still enables it.
Then Gnulib should disregard their whims and move on. If a program
employs %n incorrectly, and that exposes a security vulnerability as a
result, the fault lies with the authors of said program rather than
Gnulib.
- Re: Android port, (continued)
- Re: Android port, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/07
- Re: Android port, Angelo Graziosi, 2023/08/07
- Re: Android port, Corwin Brust, 2023/08/07
- Re: Android port, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Angelo Graziosi, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Bruno Haible, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Manuel Giraud, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Po Lu, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Paul Eggert, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Android port, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Arsen Arsenović, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Bruno Haible, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Po Lu, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Po Lu, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Bruno Haible, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Po Lu, 2023/08/06
- Re: Android port, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/08/06