[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [External] : Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: [External] : Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Sep 2023 08:23:50 +0000 |
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> > I don't think every Emacs user should be
> > expected to be familiar with Git OR to
> > know how to `M-x package-upgrade'.
>
> I agree. (I have only the most basic knowledge of how to use git, and
> I have no idea how to use package-upgrade. And I can't afford to
> spend time learning more. In the abstract, I'd be glad to know -- but
> I am overloaded already!)
I think that this discussion got completely disconnected from the
starting point. In the above replies, I was advocating that updating
from ELPA is __easier__ compared to updating from Git and Emacs users
are more likely to know how to update from ELPA and less likely to known
how to update from Git:
>> >> Is there any downside holding on a minor release if _some_ bugs are
>> >> already fixed, even if others are not yet?
>> >
>> > What would be the point? People who want something like that can
>> > simply build the Git release branch, where we fix bugs every few days.
>>
>> For Org, a number of people just update from ELPA. Releasing benefits
>> these users.
> I don't see how is that different from updating from Git.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>