[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ELPA] New package: breadcrumb.el
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: [ELPA] New package: breadcrumb.el |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Sep 2023 21:56:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
> João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
>> Here's a link to the project (which has a screenshot)
>> https://github.com/joaotavora/breadcrumb
>
> Looks nice! I have no notable comments on the code, except that the
> indentation out of place in two parts of the file.
Thanks, I just spotted that and will fix briefly.
>> Here's the patch for elpa.git
>>
>> diff --git a/elpa-packages b/elpa-packages
>> index 7bbf35a..cfceb7e 100644
>> --- a/elpa-packages
>> +++ b/elpa-packages
>> @@ -99,6 +99,9 @@
>> (bnf-mode :url "https://github.com/sergeyklay/bnf-mode")
>> (boxy :url "https://gitlab.com/tygrdev/boxy")
>> (boxy-headings :url "https://gitlab.com/tygrdev/boxy-headings")
>> + (breadcrumb :url "https://github.com/joaotavora/breadcrumb"
>> + :readme "README.md"
>
> Are you sure you want to use the README.md file to generate the package
> description, or wouldn't you rather rely on the Commentary section?
Better rely on the Commentary, yes. Just consider remove that line
removed from the patch.
> Having a "Screenshot" heading followed by nothing might look weird.
>
>> + :ignored-files ("screenshot.png"))
>
> If possible, it would be nice to track this on your end with a
> .elpaignore file.
That's perfectlky doable, but I do think it makes a bit more sense like
this. Why do you think it's "nicer"? And can we merge it as is for now
(so I can tick this off my todo? ;-)
João
Re: [ELPA] New package: breadcrumb.el, Jonas Bernoulli, 2023/09/05