Re: master 82cc1f4fda1: Revert use of seq-count in shr-count

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> Cc: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2023 20:54:25 +0000
> 
> With seq becoming more and more popular, is there any conceivable way of
> making it faster as well?  The overhead of generic functional-call
> dispatching always has me weary of using the library, or at the very
> least has me think about it twice as it is convenient.  Is there some
> way to use the type inference that native compilation appears to provide
> to statically determine what implementation to use?

I think we should start by measuring its actual performance as
compared to more "traditional" implementations.  Then we will have the
base line and data for making the decisions.