[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: c-ts-mode
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: c-ts-mode |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Sep 2023 12:37:07 +0300 |
> From: João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 10:25:28 +0100
> Cc: Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>, emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023, 05:15 Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> C-ts-mode could definitely be improved in terms of customization, and any
> feature in general.
> Any help is welcome!
>
> How difficult would it be, in your opinion, to have c-ts-mode or c++-ts-mode
> import cc-mode styles as
> treesitter rules? I'd be interested in that feature even if the importation
> is not 100% accurate.
Some of the styles are already supported. The rest should also be
possible (at least most of them), but someone will have to write the
code. It is not a simple matter of "importing", since CC Mode
implements these features based on infrastructure that either doesn't
exist or makes no sense in treesit-supported modes.
- Re: c-ts-mode, Yuan Fu, 2023/09/01
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/07
- Re: c-ts-mode,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/07
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/07
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/07
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/07
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/07
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/07
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/07
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, João Távora, 2023/09/08
- Re: c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/08