[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Sep 2023 00:38:54 -0700 |
"T.V Raman" <raman@google.com> writes:
> Hope it gets fixed upstream in Hydra. But stepping back a level:
>
> 1. Byte Compiler warnings are really useful when developing in Emacs
> Lisp.
> 2. But they lose their value if the byte compiler gets noisy
No disagreement there.
> -- in
> this case I think this warning qualifies as noise because:
>
> A. The developer who is hit with this warning can do nothing
> about it
> B. It obscures more useful warnings
>
A typical case looks like this:
(defmacro foo (name)
`(defun bar ()
,(format "foo %s." name)))
If someone passes in a string NAME longer than 80 characters, that will
generate a warning. It is the responsibility of whoever writes a macro
to ensure it doesn't generate long docstrings by properly wrapping it.
The same is true for any byte-compiler warning.
In core we use `internal--format-docstring-line' for this, which means
that fixed code for the above would look like this:
(defmacro foo (name)
`(defun bar ()
,(internal--format-docstring-line
(format "foo %s." name))))
I don't think there's anything we can do about macros in third-party
packages, unfortunately. Perhaps `internal--format-docstring-line' is
useful enough not to be marked internal, though? I'm not sure.
> And by the way when this was fixed a few months ago, it
> ws fixed in the Emacs tree.
But that warning was due to a macro in our tree, right?
- Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back, (continued)
- Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back, T.V Raman, 2023/09/27
- Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back, Emanuel Berg, 2023/09/27
- Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back, Stefan Kangas, 2023/09/28
- Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back, T.V Raman, 2023/09/28
- Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/09/28
- Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back, T.V Raman, 2023/09/28
- Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/29
- Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back, Stefan Kangas, 2023/09/29
- Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back, T.V Raman, 2023/09/29
- Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/29
- Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back,
Stefan Kangas <=
- Re: bytecomp: doc string wider than 80 spurious warnings are back, T.V Raman, 2023/09/28