[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] TaskPaper and Org-Mode?
From: |
Clint Laskowski |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] TaskPaper and Org-Mode? |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:00:37 -0500 |
I think simplicity would be the biggest advantage. I started with
Org-Mode about six months ago and I think I've noticed an increase in
the complexity (that's probably also partly due to reading threads on
this list which, arguably, is a portal into the most complex aspects
of Org-Mode).
I need to re-think/re-consider my suggestion and articulate it more
clearly, I think!
-- Clint
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Sven Bretfeld <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> "Egli Christian (KIRO 433)" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> TaskPaper seems to be a really simple way of documenting tasks in text
> >> with a GTD style. Here's an example:
> >
> >> I think it would be extremely useful to incorporate TaskPaper into
> >> Org-Mode.
> >
> >From what I can tell Taskpaper seems to be a subset of org-mode. How
> > would an integration of TaskPaper look like? What features does
> > TaskPaper have that org-mode doesn't have?
>
> I just read through the web-description and had a short look at the
> code of tastpaper.el. And the very same question appears to me.
>
> The only thing I can imagine why one should prefer taskpaper.el over
> org is its simplicity. org-mode has grown quite complex in the last
> few months. That's an advantage, of course, but might prevent new
> users from giving it a try. However, an integration of both modes
> would rise the complexity.
>
> I may be wrong. Which advantage do you see, Clint?
>
> Greetings
>
> Sven
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
>
--
-- Clint
Clint Laskowski, CISSP
address@hidden