[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] New exporter: no custom timestamps
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] New exporter: no custom timestamps |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:44:18 +0100 |
Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
> I tend to think that :raw-value would be a good option. Timestamps
> properties could be enriched. Besides common properties
> (:begin, :end, :post-blank) timestamps objects may accept :
>
> - :type
> - :year-start
> - :year-end
> - :month-start
> - :month-end
> - :day-start
> - :day-end
> - :hour-start
> - :hour-end
> - :minute-start
> - :minute-end
> - :repeater-type (a symbol among: `cumulative', 'catch-up', 'restart'
> corresponding to, respectively "+", "++" ".+" repeater marks)
> - :repeater-value
> - :raw-value
>
> :*-end properties would be the same as :*-start properties when
> timestamp isn't a range. Both would be nil (along with :repeater-*) when
> type is `diary'.
>
> By default back-ends would use :raw-value and `org-translate-time'.
>
> :range-end property would be removed.
Done. I've also added :repeater-unit for good measure.
Regards,
- Re: [O] New exporter: no custom timestamps,
Nicolas Goaziou <=