Re: [O] observations on updating to recent org

[Greg Troxel]

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

> Greg Troxel <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I timed this.  With 6161 lines in 14 org-mode files (about 2175 of which
>> are due to PROPERTIES/ID/END), doing a combined export took 88s of cpu
>> time.   emacs-23.4.1, NetBSD 6, i386, plenty of RAM, Core i5 2.9 GHz.
>> In contrast, starting up emacs and generating the agenda took 0.97s.
>
> You may want to use ELP to instrument Org and report where most time is
> spent.

OK - will try to do that.

>> I noticed that TODO entries got exported multiple times, apparently once
>> for each inactive timestamp.  (I realize I need to prepare a minimal
>> example.)
>
> This is to be expected. Each plain timestamp defines a new VEVENT block.

I guess that's an interesting question about what makes sense.   Here's
the actual todo entry, with just a few words redacted.  I don't see why
someone would want VEVENTS for this kind of history, but I suppose maybe
that's what you get when you turn on events from inactive timestamps.

  ***** TODO [#C] order more [redacted]
        SCHEDULED: <2014-04-28 Mon .+4w>
        - State "DONE"       from "TODO"       [2013-11-07 Thu 10:30]
        - State "DONE"       from "TODO"       [2013-08-05 Mon 16:27]
        - State "DONE"       from "WAITING"    [2013-06-04 Tue 10:27]
        - State "WAITING"    from "TODO"       [2013-05-28 Tue 11:19] \\
          ordered via [redacted]
        - State "DONE"       from "TODO"       [2013-03-25 Mon 23:16]
          laura did
        - State "DONE"       from "WAITING"    [2013-01-08 Tue 11:49]
        - State "WAITING"    from "TODO"       [2012-12-18 Tue 20:41] \\
          ordered
        - State "TODO"       from "WAITING"    [2012-09-20 Thu 13:05]
        - State "WAITING"    from "TODO"       [2012-09-13 Thu 10:01] \\
          ordered
        - State "DONE"       from "TODO"       [2012-07-12 Thu 10:39]
        - State "DONE"       from "TODO"       [2012-06-04 Mon 14:22]
        - State "DONE"       from "TODO"       [2012-03-27 Tue 08:54]
        - State "DONE"       from "TODO"       [2011-10-01 Sat 08:10]
        :PROPERTIES:
        :ID:       b617c8e4-c8f2-11e0-8735-000476353fb4
        :LAST_REPEAT: [2013-11-07 Thu 10:30]
        :END:

> By default, it shouldn't do this for inactive timestamps, though. See
> `org-icalendar-with-timestamps'.

I didn't try to turn this on.  My icalendar-relevant settings are

      (setq org-icalendar-alarm-time 10)
      (setq org-icalendar-use-scheduled nil)
      (setq org-icalendar-use-deadline nil)

I am trying to get ics entries only for headlines with active timestamps.

>> Thanks for the comments; I see the point that this is hard..  For now,
>> I've just turned off uid storing, because I don't sync the exported
>> calendar, and I'll nuke the ID entries and properties drawers at some
>> point; I find them distracting when editing.
>
> Note that UID storing is off by default.

Yes - I had it turned on intentionally from long ago.

>> I wonder if there's some way to go back and store the UID when it
>> actually needs to be generated, so that UIDs are only stored for entries
>> that actually have been exported.
>
> This is not really possible without some sacrifices (which Bastien may
> or may not want to do).  See other messages in this thread.

I did see them, but I guess I just don't understand enough for this to
make sense.  That's ok - please don't try harder to explain to me :-)

> Also, since you don't need UID anyway, why is that a problem anymore?
> I'm a bit confused here.

It's not a problem for me any more.  It just seems really unfortunate
for others in the general case to have extra content in every headline
when it isn't necessary.

pgpGhzK66Jnuk.pgp
Description: PGP signature