[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] setting left margin in PDF output of ORG file
From: |
John Hendy |
Subject: |
Re: [O] setting left margin in PDF output of ORG file |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:23:09 -0500 |
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Michael Strey <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 2014-04-25, John Hendy wrote:
[snip]
>> Default Org -> LaTeX article looks *ugly as all hell* to me.
>
> Check the Komascript classes.
Missed this point. I've dabbled with them a little, but will have to
take another look as they come up quite a bit. The point made above
was:
> Please read
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canons_of_page_construction
> before changing anything in the layout of margins.
> The typical LaTeX classes are made thorougly with those classic rules of
> page construction in mind.
So I took the most "typical" LaTeX class to be the default one used,
article. I'd expect the most common LaTeX class to truly represent the
pinnacle of typesetting glory ;) Other than font, if Koma changes
geometry/borders... I'm thinking that the article class must either 1)
not embody "the classic rules" that well or 2) the classic rules
aren't very aesthetically pleasing after all.
John
- Re: [O] setting left margin in PDF output of ORG file, (continued)
Re: [O] setting left margin in PDF output of ORG file, Michael Strey, 2014/04/24
Re: [O] setting left margin in PDF output of ORG file, Michael Strey, 2014/04/28
Re: [O] setting left margin in PDF output of ORG file, John Hendy, 2014/04/28
Re: [O] setting left margin in PDF output of ORG file,
John Hendy <=
Re: [O] setting left margin in PDF output of ORG file, Thomas S. Dye, 2014/04/28
Re: [O] setting left margin in PDF output of ORG file, John Hendy, 2014/04/28
Re: [O] setting left margin in PDF output of ORG file, Achim Gratz, 2014/04/25