Re: [DISCUSSION] The meaning of :cmdline header argument across babel backends

[Ihor Radchenko]

Matt <matt@excalamus.com> writes:

> Since we're considering this for all babel backends, "interpreter-args" 
> wouldn't describe gcc or other compilers.  What about :command-args, 
> :command-args, :cmd-args?  "Command" is the only thing I can think of that 
> describes all of the languages, other than maybe "binary" or "executable".  
> Maybe we could simply use ":args"?  Maybe ":meta-args" since gcc or bash is 
> meta to the script/artifact?

I am not a big fan. It might be easily confused with :script-args.

Maybe instead use two different extra arguments:
:interpreter-args / :compiler-args ?

Then, also :script-args / :program-args

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>