Re: utf-translate-cjk-mode

[Dave Love]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> There may be some specific difficulty with this approach--I don't
> know--

I do, and it's not really specific.  Mule 5 just doesn't work like
that.  I did the best I could with it.  As far as I can tell, what
I've done in this case is reasonable for typical CJK users.  Is there
evidence otherwise?  If someone can implement better stuff, great, but
no-one has been prepared to contribute.

> but on general principles it is the clean thing to do.

See `set-charset-priority' & al in Mule 7 (the emacs-unicode CVS
branch).