Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text

[Stefan Monnier]

> would actually seem more logical to undo Stefan's changes, which cause
> other problems like disabling `line-move-ignore-invisible', that is,
> make previously optional behavior mandatory.  I do not understand the

We could easily introduce a new config variable for my changes.
The only reason it's not there is because nobody asked for it (I actually
have no idea why line-move-ignore-invisible is nil by default, which just
forces all packages that use `invisible' to first set it to non-nil).

> rationale behind _both_ having Stefan's "invisibility implies
> intangibility with some minor changes" type behavior and supporting
> invisible-intangible.  I understand the rationale behind either one of
> these two solutions, but not behind both at the same time.

Agreed.  I don't think there's a rationale behind it.


        Stefan