[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HELLO changes
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: HELLO changes |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:18:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> > Doesn't the current Emacs represent them with different codes,
> > treating them as different charsets?
>
> Yes, but none of them are unicodes.
>
> That is rather cryptic and I can't draw a conclusion from that. Could
> you say how they ARE treated now?
I don't think this is getting anywhere (except, I think, illustrating
the confusion I wanted to avoid).
The relationship between the Emacs 21 char codes and unicodes is
encapsulated in `encode-char', `decode-char', and the tables they use
from ucs-tables.el.
- Re: HELLO changes, (continued)
- Re: HELLO changes, Juri Linkov, 2003/10/03
- Re: HELLO changes, Jason Rumney, 2003/10/04
- Re: HELLO changes, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/04
- Re: HELLO changes, Dave Love, 2003/10/05
- Re: HELLO changes, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/06
- Re: HELLO changes, Dave Love, 2003/10/10
- Re: HELLO changes, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/13
- Re: HELLO changes, Dave Love, 2003/10/14
- Re: HELLO changes, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/15
- Re: HELLO changes,
Dave Love <=
- Re: HELLO changes, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/23
- Re: HELLO changes, Dave Love, 2003/10/25
- Re: HELLO changes, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/27
- Re: HELLO changes, Kenichi Handa, 2003/10/28
- Re: HELLO changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/28
- Re: HELLO changes, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/29
- Re: HELLO changes, Kenichi Handa, 2003/10/30
Re: HELLO changes, Dave Love, 2003/10/05