Re: HELLO changes

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:
> FWIW, I used "Unicode characters" in that text because I thought (and
> still think) it's a good approximation to "characters represented by
> the character set mule-unicode-0100-24ff", and one that doesn't risk
> confusing the user with obscure terms such as mule-unicode-0100-24ff.

I think users must understand that Emacs 21 may represent
the same Unicode character differently (e.g. in
latin-iso8859-2 and mule-unicode-0100-24ff).  In spite of
Dave's huge work, Emacs 21 still can't hide that difference.
Then, I think we shouldn't hide that defect.  Making
"mule-unicode-0100-24ff" a hyperlink to the documentation of
that charset, and improving the documentation should reduce
the users confusion (thought both are not yet done).

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden