[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: diff-yank-handler is evil
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: diff-yank-handler is evil |
Date: |
24 Mar 2004 16:31:02 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
>>> Leading '+', '!' and '-' are stripped -- it's no longer a valid diff
>>> after yanking. It's not useful to send someone a bogus diff.
>> Please give us an example.
> Enable font-lock. Place the following in a buffer in diff-mode:
> diff -c /home/harder/t1.txt /home/harder/t2.txt
> *** /home/harder/t1.txt Wed Mar 24 21:34:50 2004
> --- /home/harder/t2.txt Wed Mar 24 21:35:07 2004
> ***************
> *** 1,4 ****
> ! Foo.
> Bar.
> Bla bla bla.
> --- 1,4 ----
> ! FOO.
> Bar.
> Bla bla bla.
> ***************
> *** 6,8 ****
> --- 6,9 ----
> Bla bla bla.
> + Baz.
> Diff finished. Wed Mar 24 21:35:12 2004
Thanks.
> Come on, "missing !'s when pasting" is pretty specific. Besides, this
> behaviour was so easy to trigger, that I didn't think you'd need a
> verbose 140 line bug-report to reproduce it.
Do you really think I'd bother to bitch if I hadn't tried it first (and
failed to create the problem)?
OK, I see that a change to subr.el's yank-handler code broke
diff-yank-handler about 90% (and I only use the remaining 10%).
I don't see how to fix it with the new yank-handler behavior, so I'll
disable it for now.
Stefan
- diff-yank-handler is evil, Jesper Harder, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Jesper Harder, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Jesper Harder, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/25
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/25
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/28
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/29
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/29
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/25