[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad change to tooltip.el
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: bad change to tooltip.el |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:25:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> OK. I didn't realise that. My example was for `make recompile'. Why aren't
> the .els compiled separately in this case also?
I'm not sure what's the reason, but I know that I'd oppose any such change
because the speed difference is much too large. I always use `make
recompile' and it works just fine. There are a few minor problems every
once in a while, but it's not like re-running Emacs each time fixes each and
every one of those anyway. I'd rather fix the byte-compiler to behave
better with `make recompile' than to force the slowdown of launching
a separate process for each file.
Stefan
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, (continued)
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/12
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/12
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/14
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/14
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan, 2004/11/14
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/15
Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/16
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/16
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/17
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/17
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/19
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/20
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/22
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/22
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/22